Repository of University of Nova Gorica

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Slovenska glagolska predpona ob- s pomenom vztrajanja v luči leksikalno-nadleksikalne delitve in hierarhije predpon
Authors:ID Žaucer, Rok (Mentor) More about this mentor... New window
ID Gabrijelčič, Marjana (Author)
Files:.pdf Marjana_Gabrijelcic.pdf (469,69 KB)
MD5: 9ED89672C049381693C5553BB44CB08D
 
Language:Slovenian
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FH - Faculty of Humanities
Abstract:V diplomskem delu obravnavam glagole s predpono ob- s pomenom vztrajanja v stanju (npr. obsedeti). Del literature deli glagolske predpone na dve oziroma tri velike skupine (npr. Svenonius 2004, Tatevosov 2008), vendar kakršnihkoli trditev o uvrstitvi glagolov s pomenom vztrajanja v stanju v njej ne najdemo. Z izbranimi glagoli grem skozi vse teste, ki jih najdemo pri Svenoniusu (2004) in Tatevosovu (2008), in preverjam, v katero skupino jih lahko uvrstimo, med leksikalne glagolske predpone, med nadleksikalne glagolske predpone ali celo med vmesne predpone. Nadalje se v literaturi najde poskus razdelanega opisa možnih razporeditev predpon (Wiland 2012), zato poskušam ugotoviti tudi, kam se predpona ob- s pomenom vztrajanja v stanju uvršča v Wilandovi hierarhiji. Glede na Svenoniusovo delitev ugotavljam, da se vztrajalni ob- obnaša kot nadleksikalna predpona. Glede na Wilandovo hierarhijo predpon pa ugotavljam, da se obnaša kot najnižja nadleksikalna predpona. Kot skupni zaključek v nalogi ugotavljam, da imamo vztrajalni ob- lahko za najnižjo nadleksikalno predpono v Wilandovi hierarhiji predpon. A za trdnost te trditve so potrebne še nekatere domneve, ki zaenkrat ostajajo nepreverljive. Ob omenjeni interpretaciji rezultatov sledi tudi, da nekateri testi iz predhodne literature niso povsem zanesljivi.
Keywords:predpona, prefiks, leksikalna predpona, nadleksikalna predpona, vmesna predpona, časovni pomen, vidska predpona, časovna predpona, krajevnost dejanja, krajevna predpona, prostorska predpona, skladenjska hierarhija
Place of publishing:Nova Gorica
Year of publishing:2015
PID:20.500.12556/RUNG-1834 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:3926011 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UNG:REP:E1BBIBVN
Publication date in RUNG:15.06.2015
Views:6911
Downloads:264
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The Slovene verbal prefix ob- in its meaning of persistence in the context of the lexical-superlexical distinction and of the prefix hierarchy
Abstract:In my thesis I investigate verbs with the verbal prefix ob- in the meaning of persistence in a state (e.g. ob-sedeti [OB-sit] 'remain sitting'). One part of the literature divides verbal prefixes into two or three large groups (e.g. Svenonius 2004, Tatevosov 2008), but make no claims about the classification of prefixed verbs with the meaning of persistence in a state. I apply all the tests from Svenonius (2004) and Tatevosov (2008) to the group of investigated verbs in order to determine which group they belong to: lexical prefixes, superlexical prefixes or even intermediate prefixes. Furthermore, we canalso find in the literature an attempt of a detailed description of possible combinations of prefixes (Wiland 2012). Therefore I also try to determine where the prefix ob- in its meaning of persistence in a state fits in Wiland's hierarchy. With respect to Svenonius’ classification, the verbal prefix ob- in its meaning of persistence in a state is found to behave like superlexical prefix. With respect to Wiland's hierarchy, is found to behave like the lowest superlexical prefix. Combining these two sets of results, I conclude that the prefix ob- in its meaning of persistence in a state can be considerate as the lowest superlexical prefix in Wiland's hierarchy of prefixes. However, this conclusion can only be drawn if we make certain potentially questionable assumptions, so some reservations about it remains. The suggested interpretation of the results also leads to the conclusion that some of the tests from the previous literature are not completely reliable.
Keywords:prefix, lexical prefix, superlexical prefix, intermediate prefix, locative prefix, spatial prefix, aspectual prefix, temporal prefix, syntactic hierarchy


Back