When a Wh-Word Refuses to Stay in SituAli Al Moussaoui
, Artur Stepanov
, 2020, original scientific article
Abstract: Richards (2010, 2016) suggests that a language’s choice between the wh-movement option and the wh-in-situ option is made on the basis of language-specific prosodic properties that determine whether or not a prosodic wh-domain containing both the interrogative C and the wh-phrase can be established. A wh-domain in this sense roughly corresponds to a piece of prosodic structure in which these two key elements are separated by as few prosodic boundaries as possible, ideally zero. Prosodic boundaries demarcate structural units of the sentence, known as Minor or Intermediate Phrases that may trivially or nontrivially correspond to syntactic constituents.
Found in: ključnih besedah
Summary of found: ...is made on the basis of language-specific prosodic properties that determine whether or not a... ...that determine whether or not a prosodic wh- domain containing both the interrogative C and the...
Keywords: prosodic domain, Minor Phrase, wh-in-situ, wh-movement, Lebanese Arabic, French, Italian
Published: 01.04.2020; Views: 2137; Downloads: 247
Fulltext (639,70 KB)