Repozitorij Univerze v Novi Gorici

Iskanje po repozitoriju
A+ | A- | Pomoč | SLO | ENG

Iskalni niz: išči po
išči po
išči po
išči po
* po starem in bolonjskem študiju

Opcije:
  Ponastavi


1 - 2 / 2
Na začetekNa prejšnjo stran1Na naslednjo stranNa konec
1.
Land in the common use in the 19th century : the case of the manor of Duino in the Karst region
Nikita Peresin Meden, 2025, doktorska disertacija

Opis: Common land was, until land relief in 1848, mostly owned by the landlords and was managed and used by them and the village communities. This land generally comprised the less fertile and more remote areas, such as pastures and forests. The rights to use the latter were vital for the rural population, who depended in particular on common pasturage and wood, but also on leaves and other natural resources. The dissertation focuses on the 19th century and the early 20th century, up to the First World War. Although the second half of the 18th century is also considered in the interests of a comprehensive study. The presentation and interpretation of the state and changes of the common lands in the provinces of Carniola and Gorizia-Gradisca is followed by an in-depth case study of the area of the manor of Duino and after 1848 of the District Governorship of Sežana. Here, research focuses primarily on the long- standing official and unofficial processes by which common land was divided into private ownership or individual use. After 1848, the latter became the property of the village communities or the newly formed political municipalities. The legal status of the land and the role of the main actors (communities, mayors, beneficiaries, authorities) in these processes are therefore examined. This emphasises the socio- economic role of common land rights, which ultimately led to overexploitation and violations of land use restrictions (i.e. afforestation laws). The dissertation offers an original study as well as an in-depth analysis and interpretation of archival material that has not yet been studied or published. The problematic and unclear legal status of common land was the cause of numerous conflicts and controversies in the past, which were intensified by the existential importance of the land and peasant mentality. This situation was exacerbated in the 19th century, and was reflected in the various forms of legal status of common land or its shares after division. The use of common land was becoming even more restricted and the claims to the shares were all but obvious. Both use and entitlement were not free, as is often assumed. The beneficiaries paid and sometimes even overpaid for their rights. In the dissertation, we have outlined the various conditions for entitlement to common land or shares of common land, and interpreted the process of its division into private or common property. We have established that common land was divided into ownerships mainly from the mid-19th century onwards, which was linked to the land relief during 1848. It should be noted that it was divided into individual use before, and also after the mid-19th century. However, it was later more difficult for the authorities to approve this kind of division, as it did not comply with land relief legislation. As a result, such divisions eventually took place unofficially. Administrative reorganisations in the 19th century brought even more confusion to the process. The issue of unclear status accompanied and conditioned development on common land in the past, and it is legislation at state and local levels that has played and continues to play the greatest role in the management of common land.
Ključne besede: common land, Karst, microhistory, land use, privatization of land, 19th century, community, rights of the commoner, duties of the commoner, dissertations
Objavljeno v RUNG: 11.06.2025; Ogledov: 296; Prenosov: 2
.pdf Celotno besedilo (6,81 MB)

2.
Pomen pravočasnega obvestila o napaki pri posamezni vrsti pogodbe
Rok Fakin, 2017, diplomsko delo

Opis: Način, roki in posledice nepravočasnega in nepravilnega grajanja napak v zakonodaji niso enovito urejeni. Obligacijski zakonik določa splošno ureditev, upoštevati pa je treba še številne specialne predpise, kar pride najbolj do izraza pri prodajni pogodbi, pri gradbeni pogodbi pa se je treba opreti tudi na Posebne gradbene uzance. Poleg tega je treba upoštevati vrsto napake, saj postavljajo predpisi različna merila za očitne in skrite napake, posebej pa so urejene še pravne napake. Namen diplomske naloge je opozoriti na pomen skrbnega ravnanja pogodbene stranke v fazi izpolnitve pogodbe. Za to, da lahko od nasprotne stranke uspešno uveljavlja pravice iz naslova odgovornosti za napake, mora slediti pravilom o pregledu in prevzemu stvari ter pravočasnem in pravilnem obvestilu o napaki. Nadalje je pomembno, da svoje pravice iz tega naslova uveljavlja pred sodiščem v predpisanem roku. Opustitev kateregakoli dejanja ima v večini primerov za posledico izgubo pravic iz naslova odgovornosti nasprotne stranke za stvarne in pravne napake izpolnitve. Diplomska naloga opozarja tudi na izjeme, ko zamuda roka ne vpliva na pravice iz naslova odgovornosti za napake. V diplomski nalogi je bilo z analizo splošnih in posebnih predpisov ter mednarodne konvencije in pravne prakse ugotovljeno, da je poznavanje posebne ureditve za posamezno vrsto pravnega posla ter tudi specialne ureditve v okviru istovrstnega pravnega posla (prodajne pogodbe) ključnega pomena za uveljavljanje pravic v primeru, ko je izpolnitev nasprotne stranke obremenjena z napako.
Ključne besede: Grajanje napak, očitne napake, skrite napake, pravne napake, pregled stvari, prevzem stvari, pravočasno in pravilno grajanje napak
Objavljeno v RUNG: 20.11.2017; Ogledov: 7121; Prenosov: 282
.pdf Celotno besedilo (871,23 KB)

Iskanje izvedeno v 0.01 sek.
Na vrh