Repozitorij Univerze v Novi Gorici

Iskanje po repozitoriju
A+ | A- | Pomoč | SLO | ENG

Iskalni niz: išči po
išči po
išči po
išči po
* po starem in bolonjskem študiju

Opcije:
  Ponastavi


1 - 4 / 4
Na začetekNa prejšnjo stran1Na naslednjo stranNa konec
1.
Whether or not anything but not whether anything or not
Elena Guerzoni, Yael Sharvit, 2013, objavljeni povzetek znanstvenega prispevka na konferenci

Ključne besede: alternative questions, polar questions, negation, NPIs
Objavljeno v RUNG: 21.02.2024; Ogledov: 661; Prenosov: 3
URL Povezava na datoteko
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več...

2.
NPIs in questions, disjunction and ellipsis
Elena Guerzoni, Yael Sharvit, 2014, objavljeni povzetek znanstvenega prispevka na konferenci

Ključne besede: alternative questions, syntax, semantics, negative polarity, strong exhaustivity
Objavljeno v RUNG: 21.02.2024; Ogledov: 624; Prenosov: 1
URL Povezava na datoteko
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več...

3.
"Whether or not anything" but not "whether anything or not" : Elektronski vir
Elena Guerzoni, Yael Sharvit, 2014, samostojni znanstveni sestavek ali poglavje v monografski publikaciji

Opis: Recent studies on interrogatives indicate that some question embedding predicates (QEPs) cannot support strongly exhaustive inferences, contra Groenendijk and Stokhof (1982) (c.f. Berman 1991, Heim 1994, Sharvit 2002). Some verbs that support strongly exhaustive inferences are know, find out, and wonder. Among the predicates that can only support weakly exhaustive inferences we find verbs like surprise, disappoint,realize, and predict n% correctly.Previous views on this problem encode the above distinction either in different lexical semantic properties (see Beck and Rullmann 1999 and Sharvit 2002) or in different selectional restrictions of different QEPs (see Guerzoni 2003), but provide no independent motivation for either. This paper proposes a pragmatic account that improves on the existing proposals in two respects. On the one hand, it provides the independent motivation for the classification of different QEPs, which was missing from earlier approaches. On the other hand, it offers an understanding of a seemingly unrelated long lasting puzzle; that is the impossibility for predicates like surprise, disappoint, realize, anticipate etc.to embed whether-complements (c.f. Karttunen 1977, Lahiri 1991, Guerzoni 2003, Guerzoni & Sharvit 2006). The remainder of this section briefly introduces the notions of weak and strong exhaustivity
Ključne besede: question embedding, strong exhaustivity
Objavljeno v RUNG: 20.02.2024; Ogledov: 535; Prenosov: 2
URL Povezava na datoteko
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več...

4.
A question of strength : on NPIs in interrogative clauses
Elena Guerzoni, Yael Sharvit, 2007, izvirni znanstveni članek

Opis: We observe that the facts pertaining to the acceptability of negative polarity items (henceforth, NPIs) in interrogative environments complex than previously noted. Since Klima [Klima, E. (1964). In J. Fodor & J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language. Prentice-Hall], it has been typically assumed that NPIs are grammatical in both matrix and embedded questions, however, on closer scrutiny it turns out that there are differences between root and embedded environments, and between question nucleus and wh-restrictor. While NPIs are always licensed in the nucleus of root questions, their acceptability in the restrictor of wh-phrases and in the nucleus of any embedded question depends on the logical properties of the linguistic environment: its strength in terms of exhaustivity [Groenendijk, J., & Stokhof, M. (1984). Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatic answers. Amserdam (NL), Post-Doctoral Dissertation. Heim, I. (1994). In R. Buchalla & A. Mittwoch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th annual IATL conference and of the 1993 IATL workshop on discourse (pp. 128–144). Akademon, Jerusalem. Beck, S., & 16 Rullmann, H. (1999). Natural Language Semantics, 7, 249–298. Sharvit, Y (2002). Natural Language Semantics, 10, 97–123] and its monotonicity properties (in the sense of von Fintel [von Fintel, K. (1999). Journal of 19 Semantics, 16, 97-148]).
Ključne besede: negative polarity items, interrogative clauses
Objavljeno v RUNG: 20.02.2024; Ogledov: 663; Prenosov: 2
URL Povezava na datoteko
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več...

Iskanje izvedeno v 0.03 sek.
Na vrh