Repozitorij Univerze v Novi Gorici

Iskanje po repozitoriju
A+ | A- | Pomoč | SLO | ENG

Iskalni niz: išči po
išči po
išči po
išči po
* po starem in bolonjskem študiju

Opcije:
  Ponastavi


1 - 4 / 4
Na začetekNa prejšnjo stran1Na naslednjo stranNa konec
1.
How to ask the obvious : a presuppositional account of evidential bias in English yes/no questions
Tue Trinh, 2014, samostojni znanstveni sestavek ali poglavje v monografski publikaciji

Opis: English can express the basic meaning of a yes/no question in several ways, for example with or without sentential negation, and with or without subject auxiliary inversion. In this paper, we discuss how the presence of contextual clue with respect to one or the other answer to a yes/no question determines which formal variants of the question are felicitous. We then derive these syntax-pragmatics interactions from Heim’s principle of Maximize Presupposition, Stalnaker’s Bridge Principle and Grice’s Maxim of Manner, each formulated in a particular way, together with the assumption that the lexicon of English contains a silent evidential marker which exhibits familiar syntactic and semantic properties.
Ključne besede: question, bias, presupposition, evidential
Objavljeno v RUNG: 09.01.2025; Ogledov: 378; Prenosov: 2
URL Povezava na datoteko
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več...

2.
"Whether or not anything" but not "whether anything or not" : Elektronski vir
Elena Guerzoni, Yael Sharvit, 2014, samostojni znanstveni sestavek ali poglavje v monografski publikaciji

Opis: Recent studies on interrogatives indicate that some question embedding predicates (QEPs) cannot support strongly exhaustive inferences, contra Groenendijk and Stokhof (1982) (c.f. Berman 1991, Heim 1994, Sharvit 2002). Some verbs that support strongly exhaustive inferences are know, find out, and wonder. Among the predicates that can only support weakly exhaustive inferences we find verbs like surprise, disappoint,realize, and predict n% correctly.Previous views on this problem encode the above distinction either in different lexical semantic properties (see Beck and Rullmann 1999 and Sharvit 2002) or in different selectional restrictions of different QEPs (see Guerzoni 2003), but provide no independent motivation for either. This paper proposes a pragmatic account that improves on the existing proposals in two respects. On the one hand, it provides the independent motivation for the classification of different QEPs, which was missing from earlier approaches. On the other hand, it offers an understanding of a seemingly unrelated long lasting puzzle; that is the impossibility for predicates like surprise, disappoint, realize, anticipate etc.to embed whether-complements (c.f. Karttunen 1977, Lahiri 1991, Guerzoni 2003, Guerzoni & Sharvit 2006). The remainder of this section briefly introduces the notions of weak and strong exhaustivity
Ključne besede: question embedding, strong exhaustivity
Objavljeno v RUNG: 20.02.2024; Ogledov: 1678; Prenosov: 3
URL Povezava na datoteko
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več...

3.
What's in the middle? Reflections on Brown et al. (2001)
Arthur Stepanov, prispevek na konferenci brez natisa

Ključne besede: intermediate acceptability rating, experimental syntax, multiple wh-question, Superiority effect
Objavljeno v RUNG: 03.05.2023; Ogledov: 2125; Prenosov: 0
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več...

4.
Prosodic marking in Russian multiple wh-questions : a sentence production study
Pavel Duryagin, Arthur Stepanov, 2021, objavljeni povzetek znanstvenega prispevka na konferenci

Ključne besede: wh-question, prosody, Russian, sentence production, pitch accent, downsteps
Objavljeno v RUNG: 21.06.2021; Ogledov: 2955; Prenosov: 53
URL Povezava na celotno besedilo
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več...

Iskanje izvedeno v 0.02 sek.
Na vrh