| Title: | RE-CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE CONSERVATION THEORY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Jokilehto, Jukka (Mentor) More about this mentor... 
ID Dobričič, Saša (Mentor) More about this mentor...
ID Ali, Usman (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  RAZ_Ali_Usman_i2017.pdf (2,37 MB)
MD5: 93E6A47824C18D13071B5312774DC13F
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Doctoral dissertation |
|---|
| Typology: | 2.08 - Doctoral Dissertation |
|---|
| Organization: | FPŠ - Graduate School
|
|---|
| Abstract: | ver the last few decades, the concept of “authenticity” has commonly been used as a criterion for heritage conservation and management in various regions around the world. In 1994, ICOMOS adopted the Nara document on Authenticity as an international recommendation to draw the attention of policy and decision makers on the values of cultural heritage, stressing on interdisciplinary of approaches. Interdisciplinary research of heritage studies includes analysis and evaluation methods to redefine the theories and methodologies of heritage preservation and management in different contexts. But, when dealing with Archaeological Heritage Management, various difficulties emerge in the adoption of prescribed criteria for heritage conservation and management.
The aim of this research is to examine and evaluate the compatibility and potential adaptation of these significant criteria from the Heritage International practice (I.e. UNESCO), including the spheres of law and philosophy, in the Management of Archaeological Heritage. Consequently, this dissertation is articulating according to the following concepts:
1. UNESCO already prescribed parameters and criteria of conservation and management of cultural heritage, but their full applicability on Archaeological Heritage Management should be verified;
2. The level of similarities and differences between Cultural and Archaeological Heritage in the conservation and management process should be discussed to highlight potential new research channels;
3. Is the adoption of the concept of Authenticity as a criterion, prescribed in UNESCO Operational Guideline, compatible enough to be applied to the Management of Archaeological Heritage or not?
4. Archaeological practice as a source of information provides various data and parameters. Are these attributions determining the management?
This dissertation concludes that thematic divisions of heritage studies foster and formulate various models and concepts (implicitly and explicitly), which determine many substantial criteria and integrated factors for the sustainability of archaeological heritage. These criteria and factors give
7
importance to the common theoretical and methodological research in archaeological heritage conservation theory and practice. |
|---|
| Keywords: | World Heritage Studies, Archaeological Heritage Management, Authenticity, Heritage Conservation, Archaeological Theories, Heritage International Doctrine. |
|---|
| Place of publishing: | Nova Gorica |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2017 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/RUNG-3113-dedbd240-a939-ab68-4279-b9399d1d01da |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 4821755 |
|---|
| NUK URN: | URN:SI:UNG:REP:BHRW19R3 |
|---|
| Publication date in RUNG: | 22.06.2017 |
|---|
| Views: | 5141 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 1496 |
|---|
| Metadata: |     |
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
