| Title: | Comparative literature and digital humanities |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Vaupotič, Aleš, University of Nova Gorica (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |
This document has no files that are freely available to the public. This document may have a physical copy in the library of the organization, check the status via COBISS.  |
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Not categorized |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.12 - Published Scientific Conference Contribution Abstract |
|---|
| Organization: | UNG - University of Nova Gorica
|
|---|
| Abstract: | The "Comparative literature and digital humanities" paper was part of the panel "Postdigital Comparatism: New methods, new frameworks, new questions?", organized by Amelia Sanz (Complutense University of Madrid), Aleš Vaupotič (University of Nova Gorica), and Silvia Ulrich (Universita di Torino). This panel tries to describe and to evaluate the headway the Comparatism made at a time when cultures, literatures and criticism can be considered inevitably post-digital: after the digital revolution dealing with cultural habitus in the 21st century. Looking forward, what difference does it make? The point is the following: are digital archives, electronic devices, and tools modifying our disciplinary field just with regard to new available sources and dissemination strategies? Or are they creating any specific epistemological modeling? Is there any comparatist condition to be satisfied by digital methodologies? Are the digital humanities and the digital literary studies (still) distinguishable from general literary studies? Can electronic technologies and digital methodologies become hegemonic, even hypercolonial, over any epistemological sovereignty? How are the comparatists coping with the interdisciplinary constellations involved in using computer technologies in research? What is the difference between digitized literatures, and digital arts and literatures from a comparatist point of view? We should reflect on the use of the communication models from new-media art as a source for the emerging digital humanities genres. Why do comparatists seem so suspicious and skeptical towards digitization process and digital arts, whereas they are used to cross over cultures, oceans and media? |
|---|
| Keywords: | digital humanities, comparative literature, methodology |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2019 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/RUNG-4925-0a9c620c-91ac-2c6e-9fb1-4591637f32ec |
|---|
| COBISS.SI-ID: | 5507835 |
|---|
| NUK URN: | URN:SI:UNG:REP:UUIC2SZO |
|---|
| Publication date in RUNG: | 13.12.2019 |
|---|
| Views: | 3800 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 0 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
