Naslov: | Comparing the derivation of modal domains and strengthened meanings |
---|
Avtorji: | ID Trinh, Tue (Avtor) |
Datoteke: | https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-25894-7_8
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-25894-7_8
|
---|
Jezik: | Angleški jezik |
---|
Vrsta gradiva: | Neznano |
---|
Tipologija: | 1.08 - Objavljeni znanstveni prispevek na konferenci |
---|
Organizacija: | UNG - Univerza v Novi Gorici
|
---|
Opis: | The derivation of strengthened meanings as proposed by Bar-Lev and Fox (2017, 2020) and the derivation of modal domains as proposed by Kratzer (1977, 1981, 1991) both involve an “inclusion” step of assigning true to as many propositions in a given set as possible. In the case of strengthened meanings, this set contains the scalar alternatives. In the case of modal domains, it contains the propositions in the ordering source. In this note, we explicate what is common and what is distinct between the two inclusion procedures. We then point out that the formal distinction makes no empirical difference for the cases of strengthened meaning so far considered in the literature. We conjecture that this fact holds generally for all cases of strengthened meaning. |
---|
Ključne besede: | modality, exhaustification, innocent inclusion, cell identification |
---|
Status publikacije: | Objavljeno |
---|
Verzija publikacije: | Objavljena publikacija |
---|
Leto izida: | 2023 |
---|
Št. strani: | Str. 156-166 |
---|
PID: | 20.500.12556/RUNG-9651 |
---|
COBISS.SI-ID: | 221473795 |
---|
UDK: | 81'1 |
---|
DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-031-25894-7_8 |
---|
NUK URN: | URN:SI:UNG:REP:OUFUS9IH |
---|
Datum objave v RUNG: | 09.01.2025 |
---|
Število ogledov: | 214 |
---|
Število prenosov: | 2 |
---|
Metapodatki: | |
---|
:
|
Kopiraj citat |
---|
| | | Skupna ocena: | (0 glasov) |
---|
Vaša ocena: | Ocenjevanje je dovoljeno samo prijavljenim uporabnikom. |
---|
Objavi na: | |
---|
Postavite miškin kazalec na naslov za izpis povzetka. Klik na naslov izpiše
podrobnosti ali sproži prenos. |