1. The Transformative Impact of Blended Mobility CoursesDaniela Brasl, Klemen Širok, Peter Purg, 2016, original scientific article Found in: ključnih besedah
Summary of found: ...site-specific, methodology, academic mobility, new media, blended, ADRIART...
Keywords: site-specific, methodology, academic mobility, new media, blended, ADRIART
Published: 06.07.2016; Views: 4036; Downloads: 0
 Fulltext (99,11 KB) |
2. IDEATE | Mentor Peter PurgUrša, B. Potokar, Metod Blejec, Peter Purg, 2015, scientific or documentary film, sound or video publication Abstract: A mentor's reflection on the teaching (and learning) experience in the IDEATE course, revolving around how did the IDEATE experience affect their personal development, and how it might influence their academic or other work-related opportunities.
Found in: ključnih besedah
Keywords: IDEATE, innovation, creativity, entrepreneurship, teaching, methodology
Published: 07.07.2016; Views: 3640; Downloads: 0 |
3. Mapping the Local: Budapest, Belgrade, Nova Gorica.Elżbieta Wysakowska-Walters, Eszter Lazar, Szabolcs Kisspal, Peter Purg, Batajić Olivera Sretenović, Allan Siegel, 2019, professional monograph Found in: ključnih besedah
Summary of found: ...mapping, methodology, city, urban, drift, flaneur, contemporary art, new...
Keywords: mapping, methodology, city, urban, drift, flaneur, contemporary art, new media
Published: 29.10.2019; Views: 2343; Downloads: 0
Fulltext (331,91 KB) |
4. Comparative literature and digital humanitiesAleš Vaupotič, 2019, published scientific conference contribution abstract Abstract: The "Comparative literature and digital humanities" paper was part of the panel "Postdigital Comparatism: New methods, new frameworks, new questions?", organized by Amelia Sanz (Complutense University of Madrid), Aleš Vaupotič (University of Nova Gorica), and Silvia Ulrich (Universita di Torino). This panel tries to describe and to evaluate the headway the Comparatism made at a time when cultures, literatures and criticism can be considered inevitably post-digital: after the digital revolution dealing with cultural habitus in the 21st century. Looking forward, what difference does it make? The point is the following: are digital archives, electronic devices, and tools modifying our disciplinary field just with regard to new available sources and dissemination strategies? Or are they creating any specific epistemological modeling? Is there any comparatist condition to be satisfied by digital methodologies? Are the digital humanities and the digital literary studies (still) distinguishable from general literary studies? Can electronic technologies and digital methodologies become hegemonic, even hypercolonial, over any epistemological sovereignty? How are the comparatists coping with the interdisciplinary constellations involved in using computer technologies in research? What is the difference between digitized literatures, and digital arts and literatures from a comparatist point of view? We should reflect on the use of the communication models from new-media art as a source for the emerging digital humanities genres. Why do comparatists seem so suspicious and skeptical towards digitization process and digital arts, whereas they are used to cross over cultures, oceans and media?
Found in: ključnih besedah
Keywords: digital humanities, comparative literature, methodology
Published: 13.12.2019; Views: 2300; Downloads: 0
Fulltext (947,46 KB) |
5. |
