Repository of University of Nova Gorica

Show document
A+ | A- | Help | SLO | ENG

Title:Exhaled breath metabolomics reveals a pathogen-specific response in a rat pneumonia model for two human pathogenic bacteria: a proof-of-concept study
Authors:ID van Oort, Pouline M, Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Center–Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Author)
ID White, Iain R., Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester, United Kingdom (Author), et al.
Files: This document has no files that are freely available to the public. This document may have a physical copy in the library of the organization, check the status via COBISS. Link is opened in a new window
Language:English
Work type:Not categorized
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:UNG - University of Nova Gorica
Abstract:Volatile organic compounds in breath can reflect host and pathogen metabolism and might be used to diagnose pneumonia. We hypothesized that rats with Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) pneumonia can be discriminated from uninfected controls by thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass-spectrometry (TD-GC-MS) and selected ion flow tube-mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) of exhaled breath. Male adult rats (n = 50) received an intratracheal inoculation of 1) 200 µl saline, or 2) 1 × 107 colony-forming units of SP or 3) 1 × 107 CFU of PA. Twenty-four hours later the rats were anaesthetized, tracheotomized, and mechanically ventilated. Exhaled breath was analyzed via TD-GC-MS and SIFT-MS. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCCs) and correct classification rate (CCRs) were calculated after leave-one-out cross-validation of sparse partial least squares-discriminant analysis. Analysis of GC-MS data showed an AUROCC (95% confidence interval) of 0.85 (0.73-0.96) and CCR of 94.6% for infected versus noninfected animals, AUROCC of 0.98 (0.94-1) and CCR of 99.9% for SP versus PA, 0.92 (0.83-1.00), CCR of 98.1% for SP versus controls and 0.97 (0.92-1.00), and CCR of 99.9% for PA versus controls. For these comparisons the SIFT-MS data showed AUROCCs of 0.54, 0.89, 0.63, and 0.79, respectively. Exhaled breath analysis discriminated between respiratory infection and no infection but with even better accuracy between specific pathogens. Future clinical studies should not only focus on the presence of respiratory infection but also on the discrimination between specific pathogens.
Keywords:biomarkers, exhaled breath analysis, infection, pneumonia
Year of publishing:2019
Number of pages:751-756
Numbering:5, 316
PID:20.500.12556/RUNG-4666-f96e3771-3df4-e023-dc58-14918e53e487 New window
COBISS.SI-ID:5424379 New window
DOI:10.1152/ajplung.00449.2018 New window
NUK URN:URN:SI:UNG:REP:WLDGHVP7
Publication date in RUNG:22.07.2019
Views:3015
Downloads:0
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
Shortened title:AJP-LUNG
Publisher:American Physiological Society
Year of publishing:2019
ISSN:10400605

Back