Show document

A+ | A- | | SLO | ENG

Title: Primerjava dveh konstrukcijsko različnih pršilnikov pri varstvu vinske trte : diplomsko delo Authors: ID Simčič, Kristijan (Author) ID Poje, Tomaž (Mentor) More about this mentor... Files: Kristijan_Simcic.pdf (2,43 MB) MD5: 3E8ACAFCF6DBA3E424A37F60A246B0A3   Language: Slovenian Work type: Bachelor thesis/paper Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis Organization: VŠVV - College of Viticulture and Enology Abstract: V letu 2022 smo v času vegetacije vinske trte opravili primerjavo dveh konstrukcijsko različnih pršilnikov pri varstvu vinske trte. V primerjavi smo ocenjevali kakovost nanosa FFS v terasasto zasajenem vinogradu, storilnost, porabo goriva in stroške uporabe strojev. Primerjali smo klasični aksialni pršilnik z možnostjo škropljenja levo in desno (Friuli Sprayers ATV 1000) in radialni pršilnik s štirimi usmerjevalniki zraka (Friuli Sprayers Compact 1000 T4) z možnostjo škropljenja štirih sten vinske trte. Za spremljanje nanosa FFS na krošnjo vinske trte smo uporabili lističe WSP, ki smo jih namestili v treh terminih. Z njimi smo določili odstotek pokritosti in število odtisov kapljic na cm2 . Z uporabo pršilnika Compact smo dosegli večjo pokritost in število odtisov kapljic na zunanji in notranji steni robnih vrst na terasi. Uporaba pršilnika ATV se je izkazala za bolj učinkovito, ko je bil grm vinske trte bolj zaraščen z zalistniki. Pri uporabi pršilnika Compact, je poraba goriva večja zaradi radialnega ventilatorja, ki zahteva večjo pogonsko moč. Kljub temu pa lahko z njim dosežemo večjo storilnost, ki je ključna pri večjih vinogradniških površinah. Keywords: diplomske naloge, pršilniki, aksialni pršilniki, radialni pršilniki, terase, vinogradi, kakovost nanašanja, poraba goriva, storilnost Publication status: Published Publication version: Version of Record Place of publishing: Nova Gorica Place of performance: Nova Gorica Publisher: K. Simčič Year of publishing: 2024 Year of performance: 2024 Number of pages: XVI, 62 str. PID: 20.500.12556/RUNG-9135  COBISS.SI-ID: 207993859  UDC: 634.8+663.2 NUK URN: URN:SI:UNG:REP:RKCDFRFV Publication date in RUNG: 18.09.2024 Views: 238 Downloads: 0 Metadata:     Cite this work Plain text BibTeX EndNote XML EndNote/Refer RIS ABNT ACM Ref AMA APA Chicago 17th Author-Date Harvard IEEE ISO 690 MLA Vancouver : Copy citation

Average score: (0 votes) Your score: Voting is allowed only for logged in users. Share: Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Licences

License:	CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:	The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Licensing start date:	21.06.2024

Secondary language

Language:	English
Title:	Comparison of two construction different air-assisted sprayers for grapevine protection
Abstract:	In 2022, during the grapevine vegetation, we compared two air-assisted sprayers with different constructions for grapevine protection. In comparison, we evaluated the quality of pesticides application in a terraced vineyard, productivity, fuel consumption and the cost of using machines. A classic axial air-assisted sprayer with the possibility of spraying left and right (Friuli Sprayers ATV 1000) and a radial air-assisted sprayer with four air deflectors (Friuli Sprayers Compact 1000 T4) with the possibility of spraying four walls canopy of the vine were included in the comparison. To monitor the application of pesticides on the vine canopy, we used water-sensitive papers, which were mounted in three periods. With the help of water-sensitive papers, we determined the percentage of coverage and the number of imprints of drops per 1 cm2 . By using the Compact air-assisted sprayer, we achieved greater coverage and the number of droplet imprints on the outer and inner walls of the edge rows on the terrace. The use of the ATV air-assisted sprayer proved to be more effective in cases where the vine canopy was more overgrown with leafhoppers. When using the Compact air-assisted sprayer, fuel consumption is higher due to the radial fan, which requires more drive power. Nevertheless, it can be used to achieve greater productivity, which is crucial for larger vineyard areas.
Keywords:	air-assisted sprayer, axial air–assisted sprayer, radial air-assisted sprayer, terraces, vineyard, application quality, fuel consumption, productivity

Back